A company's public interest score measures its size and public impact using employee, turnover, liability and ownership information. It helps determine financial-reporting and assurance requirements, but the score alone does not decide every audit or independent-review obligation.
Calculate it from reliable records for the relevant financial year, then consider the company type, its MOI and other applicable rules. This guide explains the inputs and decisions. An appropriately qualified adviser should apply the prescribed calculation and current assurance tests to your company's actual circumstances.
What the score is for
The public interest score is often called the PIS. It is a regulatory measure, not a credit rating or a score awarded by customers. A low score does not prove the business is low risk, profitable or exempt from keeping proper accounts.
The Companies Regulations prescribe the calculation and link it to particular reporting requirements. The relevant inputs must be identified consistently, rather than copied from an old worksheet without checking what changed.
Smartbook's main service is accounting and financial management. Good bookkeeping and financial reporting provide much of the evidence needed for this assessment, while a specialist reviewer or auditor may be required for the separate assurance work.
Start with employee information
The employee component uses average employee information for the financial year. It is not simply the number of people standing in the office on the last day. Staff joining and leaving during the year can affect the relevant average.
Use payroll and employment records to support the information. Distinguish employees from contractors based on the real working arrangement, not whichever label produces a lower score. If employment arrangements are unclear, resolve that issue rather than hiding it inside the calculation.
Keep the source report and method with the annual work papers. That makes the figure understandable when another accountant, reviewer or lender asks how it was obtained. A spreadsheet without supporting payroll information is harder to defend.
Use turnover for the relevant year
The turnover component concerns the company's turnover during the financial year. It is not the closing bank balance or the owner's estimate of receipts. Timing differences and payment-platform deductions can otherwise distort the figure.
Reconcile turnover to the financial records and relevant financial statements. Check whether refunds, credit notes and cut-off entries have been treated correctly. Avoid adding bank deposits indiscriminately, since loans and owner contributions are not automatically turnover.
If the company changed its financial year-end, identify the actual reporting period before reusing an earlier year's calculation. A changed period can make year-on-year comparisons misleading. Keep the score assessment tied to the same legal entity and period as the annual financial information.
Identify third-party liabilities
The liability component looks at third-party liabilities at the financial year-end under the regulations. It is not a running total of every payment made during the year. Loans, supplier balances and other obligations need to be classified correctly.
Related-party and shareholder balances require careful assessment. Do not assume every liability belongs in the same category, or that calling a loan 'owner funding' settles the legal question. Your accountant should apply the prescribed definitions to the actual parties and agreements.
Use reconciled balance-sheet accounts, loan confirmations and supplier records as evidence. Resolve unexplained negative balances or old journals before calculating the score. The work should tell a consistent story about what the company owed at year-end.
Review the ownership component
For a profit company, the score includes individuals known to have a direct or indirect beneficial interest in issued securities at year-end. For a non-profit company, the relevant membership information is considered under the regulations.
The company should use its securities register and supporting ownership records, looking through structures where the rule requires it. A director list is not a substitute for the ownership information. A director may hold no shares, while a shareholder may not be a director.
Do not confuse this component with CIPC's beneficial ownership filing test. The score calculation and the disclosure regime have different purposes and definitions. A person omitted from a particular filing threshold must not automatically be excluded from every other regulatory calculation.
Audit, review and preparation are different
Preparing annual financial statements means compiling the financial information under the applicable requirements. An independent review provides a form of assurance, and an audit provides a different assurance engagement. They are not alternative names for routine bookkeeping.
The required outcome can depend on the company type, PIS, whether statements are internally or independently compiled and other statutory circumstances. The MOI or a lender agreement may also require an audit even where an owner expects a lighter process.
CIPC's customised-MOI guidance discusses reporting and review requirements. Do not use a score calculator's final number as a complete legal opinion. Ask the accountant to state the conclusion and the reasons in writing, including any additional requirement that changes the result.
Keep an assessment file, not just a number
Save the employee workings, turnover reconciliation, liability analysis and ownership information together. Record the financial year, company details and version of the applicable rules used. Include the relevant MOI provisions and any contractual reporting requirement.
Where an assumption is uncertain, explain it and resolve it before commissioning the wrong service. A dispute about whether an amount is third-party debt, for example, may affect the calculation and the reporting conclusion.
Confirm who will prepare the financial statements and who is eligible to perform any required assurance engagement. These roles may need separation or specific professional authority. Agree the deliverables early so the company's annual work is not delayed by a late discovery about the requirement.
Use the result for planning
The PIS assessment is most useful when it helps you plan the appropriate annual reporting work. As a business grows, hires staff, borrows or changes ownership, the information behind the score can change too.
Keep management accounts, payroll records and ownership documents current rather than rebuilding them only at year-end. This also improves ordinary business decisions, independent of the reporting requirement. Reliable liabilities and turnover information help owners understand cash commitments and performance.
Obtain the calculation and legal assessment from the current regulations and an appropriately qualified adviser. Keep their workings and written conclusion with the company's annual records so the next review can follow the same evidence.
Frequently asked questions
Is the public interest score a tax calculation?
No. It is a company-law reporting measure. It does not replace income-tax, VAT or payroll calculations.
Does a low score remove the need for financial statements?
No. Proper records and applicable annual financial reporting remain necessary. Assess the full requirements rather than only the score.
Are directors the same as the ownership input?
No. The prescribed beneficial-interest information differs from the company's director list.
Can an online calculator decide whether I need an audit?
It can assist with inputs, but the final conclusion must consider the company type, MOI and other applicable requirements as well.
Need an accountant?
Smartbook supports bookkeeping, payroll, tax and financial reporting. Organised accounts make it easier to assess your reporting requirements and prepare the annual information your business needs. See how our accounting service works.